Posterous
james is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
N1038630018_2757_thumb
 

original content

i post original content, from my brain and my life. i encourage you to do so as well.

Dust514: Eve Online....with guns?

It's an MMOFPS. Will it be successful? Sadly, there isn't a good track record for games of this genre. But CCP may be able to pull one off...after all, they did make a space fighter game when fighting in space was no longer in vogue.

Other MMOFPS
I used to play Planetside pretty religiously in high school. If it wasn't the first of it's genre, it's definitely the genre's best example. It promised epic battles and it delivered. Thousands of players around a single hotly contested base. Tanks, artillery, soldiers, snipers, heavy armor...personnel carriers, dropships, fighters...all working together to create a truly novel game.

In CS, Halo, and Battlefield - probably the best known FPS, organized assault is the exception. You'll only end up participating if you delve in really deep into the game. There's an incredibly high barrier to entrance, and even when you're in, it's a pain in the ass because victories and losses have so much riding on the - emotions, pride. Things that end up determining whether the match was fun or was dismal.

But Planetside democratized the field. Made it so anyone could participate in large battlefield maneuvers. In essence, everyone was in a clan, and anyone could do anything. Those who played long enough got to direct the armies and coordinate the battle. Those too green still got the feeling of accomplishment when a base was captured. Large battles were the norm. Large outfits coordinate the assaults. Every night there was some operation to take over the world, and maybe we'd get 40% of the way there before we encountered the enemy in full force. Like I said, they delivered.

EVE and CPP
Okay, 2009. Eve online declares a MMOFPS. Whoop de doo. I'm sure some of you remember Huxley and how it was supposed to be released some 3 years ago. Huxley, the new Planetside. All shiny, new, and improved. The fact that it's been in closed beta for 3 years now is a testament to the difficulty in creating a game in this genre. That Planetside ended up spiraling to its demise within a few shorts years speaks wonders for how fragile such a game can be, even if it is successful.

CCP's community of gamers is still drawfed by that of WoW. But they've managed to corner the SciFi genre quite well. EVE succeeds because there is nothing like it. Other scifi MMOs simply fail. The community touts itself as being mature and worldly - not a friendly place for the high school kid, and people are drawn to that idea. With good execution, EVE's success is natural. Even if Blizzard were to come out with a Starcraft MMO, it would have a hard time taking the market from CCP. The best they could do is possibly make a WoW clone, but then they'd just be getting more of the same users they already have in the end.

And a single MMO is bad enough, but two? Man, that's a lot of time in front of a computer.

I am, however, pretty sure that at the very least it'll be just as beautiful as the current EVE game.

Issues?
So an MMOFPS? I'm curious to see how CCP will avoid the same problems that EVE has. If we shed all the arguments about balancing (which mean nothing, the game is already fairly balances as it is), what's left are some real issues about gameplay and the community. If, as Hilmar says, the new MMOFPS will be linked to EVE, then at the very least the community issues will carry over.

There's definitely the clannishness you find in Halo, or CS - that is that corporations are an exclusive group, not an inclusive one as they were in Planetside. The best corporations are those that end up excluding people, not inviting everyone. Not especially friendly for the newbie - to whom a sense of community is incredibly important. But it's an unfortunate outcome of gameplay and politics.

There's also the issue of scale. There are thousands upon thousands of planets. The EVE universe is massive. Most systems are completely empty. In an MMORPG this is acceptable, but in a MMOFPS it's not. How will they alleviate this issue, and will it be done well?

And what about the EVE online connection? As a subscriber to EVE online, I'll want to somehow relate my FPS character with my EVE character. I mean, they're both essentially me. And whether or not it makes sense from a story perspective is irrelevant. Why would I pay two subscriptions on two different systems, for two different games? If I pay for EVE, I want to play the FPS, and I want to have my two characters interact. I made a lot of progress in EVE, why would I throw it all away for an FPS?

I mean, that's just a few of my thoughts scribbled away in a few minutes. I don't forsee this game making new inroads into FPS mechanics themselves. It'll still play like Halo or Battlefield mostly. Maybe Quake3 a little. Who knows. What this new game will add is an extension of the current universe and the current game.

I only hope that CCP isn't overreaching on this one. It's a big gamble, and could mark the beginning of the end for CCP, or it could breathe new life into the genre.

/ramble off, moar studying now.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Articles  
Posted August 23, 2009
// 0 Comments

www.dontevenreply.com ~ 10x better than FML

Apologetic Nationals Fan
Posted at: 2009-06-30 10:20:10 | 72 comments | Add Comment
Original ad:
I am trying to get 2 tickets to the Nationals vs. Red Sox on Thursday, June 25th. I'm willing to pay up to $40.
From Mike Partlow to **********@**********.org

Hello, I do not have tickets to the Nationals, but I do have a video tape of my 7-year-old's little league team game last week. He plays for the Arby's Allstars, and they beat the Smith Hardware Little Leaguers. I am sure it will be way more entertaining than watching the Nationals get their ass whooped for the 49th time this season.

From austin ******* to Me

Fuck yourself, asshole.

From Mike Partlow to austin *******

Austin, my 7-year-old son was on the computer and he read your very offensive e-mail. Now he is going around telling everyone to "fuck themselves." Me and my wife tried to raise him to be a kid who doesn't curse, but thanks to your profanity, he thinks it is okay. I demand an apology from you.

From austin ******* to Me

You want my apology? Go fuck yourself.

From Mike Partlow to austin *******

I did have the tickets; I was just messing around with you. They were good seats - 10 rows back from third base. I was going to sell them both for $30. I would rather burn them, however, if you don't apologize. If you do apologize, the tickets will be yours.

From Mike Partlow to austin *******

I'm waiting...

From austin ******* to Me

I'm sorry about your kid.

From Mike Partlow to austin *******

Hah, what a sucker. I made you look like little bitch in front of my 7-year-old son. I don't actually have any tickets. Thanks for helping me teach my son a lesson about how not to keep your dignity.

Mike

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Articles  
Posted July 13, 2009
// 1 Comment

Bicycling Magazine Snippet

You pray before every meal. You give thanks for the food you are about to eat, and for the friends who believe in you, and for the wonderful day ahead. You wake at 6:30, and you drink two cups of coffee before you walk your dog. You ride your bike, and that helps. You keep busy, and you eat right, and that helps too. But there are quiet, still moments that must feel like lifetimes when you wonder if you will ever be forgiven.

You cheated a business partner. You lied on your income taxes. You betrayed a confidence. You gossiped about your best friend. You neglected your child. You hit your wife. You cheated on your husband. Maybe you did worse. Maybe you did much worse. You were cowardly. You acted out of lust, or wounded pride, or anger. You hurt people.

You're not a world-class athlete, and you were never convicted for a crime. You don't have to endure reporters' questions or public censure. You have to confront only yourself. You only have to make it through your own still, quiet moments. Do you apologize to those you hurt? Would it change anything? Do you give your clothes to the Salvation Army? Do you volunteer at a soup kitchen? Do you move and start your life over? Do you do good works to forget your sins or to atone for them? Does it matter? Does it change anything? Does it change what you did? Does it change who you are? And who are you? Who are you?

- Steve Friedman

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Articles   Health  
Posted April 1, 2009
// 2 Comments

BBC NEWS | Health | 'Brain decline' begins at age 27

'Brain decline' begins at age 27

Concentration
Mental abilities decline at a relatively young age, experts suspect

Mental powers start to dwindle at 27 after peaking at 22, marking the start of old age, US research suggests.

Professor Timothy Salthouse of Virginia University found reasoning, speed of thought and spatial visualisation all decline in our late 20s.

Therapies designed to stall or reverse the ageing process may need to start much earlier, he said.

His seven-year study of 2,000 healthy people aged 18-60 is published in the journal Neurobiology of Aging.

To test mental agility, the study participants had to solve puzzles, recall words and story details and spot patterns in letters and symbols.

The natural decline of some of our mental abilities as we age starts much earlier than some of us might expect
Rebecca Wood of the Alzheimer's Research Trust

The same tests are already used by doctors to spot signs of dementia.

In nine out of 12 tests the average age at which the top performance was achieved was 22.

The first age at which there was any marked decline was at 27 in tests of brain speed, reasoning and visual puzzle-solving ability.

Things like memory stayed intact until the age of 37, on average, while abilities based on accumulated knowledge, such as performance on tests of vocabulary or general information, increased until the age of 60.

Professor Salthouse said his findings suggested "some aspects of age-related cognitive decline begin in healthy, educated adults when they are in their 20s and 30s."

Rebecca Wood of the Alzheimer's Research Trust agreed, saying: "This research suggests that the natural decline of some of our mental abilities as we age starts much earlier than some of us might expect - in our 20s and 30s.

"Understanding more about how healthy brains decline could help us understand what goes wrong in serious diseases like Alzheimer's.

"Alzheimer's is not a natural part of getting old; it is a physical disease that kills brain cells, affecting tens of thousands of under 65s too.

"Much more research is urgently needed if we are to offer hope to the 700,000 people in the UK who live with dementia, a currently incurable condition."

Damn it, we're getting close to the peak fellas. Get all your thinkin' done now before it's all gone!

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Articles   Health  
Posted March 16, 2009
// 1 Comment

The Way We Live Now - Growing Up on Facebook - NYTimes.com

Online social networks are so new that it’s impossible to know their long-term impact. There’s some evidence that college students have mixed feelings about being guinea pigs for the faux-friendship age. One student interviewed for a study of why and how college students use Facebook, which was published last year in The Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, admitted that being privy to the personal details of “friends” who she had not seen in years made her uncomfortable. “Someone from earlier in her life had broken up with a boyfriend,” an author of the article, Sandra L. Calvert, a professor and chairwoman of the psychology department at Georgetown University, told me. “She felt she knew all these intimate details about this person, yet they hadn’t actually been in touch for five years.” On the other hand, a study published in 2007 in The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication suggested that hanging onto old friends via Facebook may alleviate feelings of isolation for students whose transition to campus life had proved rocky. Evidently they took comfort in knowing that “Dylan is drinking Peets.”

That may well be, but something is drowned in that virtual coffee cup — an opportunity for insight, for growth through loneliness. Perhaps my nieces will find a new way to establish distance from their former selves, to clear space for introspection and transformation. Perhaps they will evolve through judicious deleting and updating of profile information, through the constant awareness of their public face. Maybe the Greek chorus of preschool buddies will be more anchor than albatross, giving them strength to take risks or to stick out tough times. It could be that my generation was the anomalous one, that Facebook marks a return to the time when people remained embedded in their communities for life, with connections that ran deep, peers who reined them in if they strayed too far from the norm, parents who expected them to live at home until marriage (adult children are already reclaiming their childhood rooms in droves). More likely, though, the very thing that attracts us oldsters to Facebook — the lure of auld lang syne — will be its undoing. Kids, who will inevitably want to drive a stake into the heart of former lives, may simply abandon the service (remember Friendster?) and find something new: something still unformed, yet to be invented — much like themselves.

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Articles   Health  
Posted March 15, 2009
// 0 Comments